Activity
From 10/12/2019 to 11/10/2019
10/29/2019
- 11:30 AM Bug #14647 (Open): The PSW document shows finding "Include Checking Aids" but it is not highlighted in the document
- The PSW document shows finding "Include Checking Aids" but it is not highlighted in the document
- 11:03 AM Bug #14646 (Open): "Has customer-required Substances of Concern information been reported?"option under Materials Reporting is showing "Yes" in both option button
- "Has customer-required Substances of Concern information been reported?"option under Materials Reporting is showing "...
- 10:08 AM Bug #14645 (Open): Uploaded document for Checking Aids But it is not showing up in the detail page.
- Uploaded document for Checking Aids But it is not showing up in the detail page.
10/25/2019
- 04:31 PM Bug #14642 (Open): QLD- Contains 7 questions but those are not showing up with Yes/No Option in the page, All those are marked as findings.
- QLD- Contains 7 questions but those are not showing up with Yes/No Option in the page, All those are marked as findings.
10/24/2019
- 05:47 PM Bug #14622 (Open): In Control plan document Special character (Column G ) fields are highlighted, but no such findings are showing up
- In Control plan document Special character (Column G ) fields are highlighted, but no such findings are showing up
- 09:59 AM Bug #14563 (Suggestion): THe entered special characters are not showing up after saving
- The entered special characters are not showing up after saving (refer screen shot).
10/22/2019
- 04:54 PM Bug #14512 (Open): DFMEA: Target date should not be lesser than revision date. If its lesser than revision date, then it should show as finding
- DFMEA: Target date should not be lesser than revision date. If its lesser than revision date, then it should show as ...
- 04:47 PM Bug #14511 (Open): DFMEA: Recommended action required text should not be automatically entered in the document when its blank. No finding when the field has text Recommended action required
- DFMEA: Recommended action required text should not be automatically entered in the document when its blank. No findin...
- 02:52 PM Bug #14510 (Open): DFMEA: Finding should be same when the user enters 1/10 in severity.. Same for occurrence and detection
- DFMEA: when the severity is entered as 1/10, then it should show the finding as "The severity is 1 or 10 " but when t...
- 12:40 PM Bug #14509 (Open): DFMEA: Number of key findings count and the key findings description count mismatching
- DFMEA: Number of key findings count and the key findings description count mismatching
- 12:26 PM Bug #14508 (Open): DFMEA: When entering cause as "Error caused by the operator" System not showing any error for the rule "Operator error in Cause is not acceptable".
- DFMEA: When entering cause as "Error caused by the operator" System not showing any error for the rule "Operator erro...
- 12:00 PM Usability #14251 (Resolved): Part Name showing case sentitive-DFMEA
- case sensitive removed..
10/17/2019
- 06:02 PM Bug #14460 (Open): THe revision date rule is not validating for PFD
- THe revision date rule (Revision date must be present & Revision date Updated within last 3 months of the PSW) is not...
- 12:40 PM Bug #14430 (Open): Recommended action has not been completed before the target completion date- Rule not validating
- The recommended action is accepting value "Completed" even after updating the target date to future dates.
This shou... - 10:01 AM Bug #14254 (Closed): DFMEA-"The Occ is 1 or 10 (7, M)" finding is showing up even after updating the value to 1 or 10.
10/16/2019
- 04:38 PM Usability #14406 (Open): DFMEA:Key findings: When clicking on the key findings button, its not moving properly to that particular cell.The user has to scroll and check the cell which has finding
- DFMEA: Key findings: When clicking on the key findings button, its not moving properly to that particular cell.The us...
- 03:08 PM Unit Level and Cosmetic Issues #14395 (Open): Supplier deletion should check the dependency. It should not allow the user to delete the supplier which has parts
- Supplier deletion should check the dependency. It should not allow the user to delete the supplier which has parts
- 03:07 PM Unit Level and Cosmetic Issues #14394 (Open): Suppliers:When deleting the supplier, its not reflected then and there. Page is not refreshed. Its removing the supplier only after refresh
- Suppliers:When deleting the supplier, its not reflected then and there. Page is not refreshed. Its removing the suppl...
- 12:20 PM Bug #14183 (Resolved): The AAR document attached is showing column names as numbers instead of alphabets
- 12:20 PM Usability #14251 (In Progress): Part Name showing case sentitive-DFMEA
- 12:01 PM Bug #14057 (Resolved): Accepting any values for the finding"Receiving goods missing/Shipping goods missing" findings in the Process flow Diagram
- That rule is updated by chad.. current rule is first operation description should have keyword 'receiving'. Then 'shi...
- 11:59 AM Bug #14254: DFMEA-"The Occ is 1 or 10 (7, M)" finding is showing up even after updating the value to 1 or 10.
- Not an issue - Closed
- 11:56 AM Bug #14254 (Fixed with Hotfix): DFMEA-"The Occ is 1 or 10 (7, M)" finding is showing up even after updating the value to 1 or 10.
- NOt an Issue
10/15/2019
- 08:01 PM Bug #14255 (Resolved): Recommended Action has to have a Target Date-DFMEA
- 12:50 PM Bug #14255 (Open): Recommended Action has to have a Target Date-DFMEA
- 08:00 PM Bug #14056 (Resolved): Added a new rule for control plan -"Part name matches with PSW" but it doesn’t comes under finding even after updating wrong partname
- 08:00 PM Bug #14111 (Resolved): Document Verification:Part name and number is different for all the documents, but its not showing any findings. It should be unique in all documents
- 07:59 PM Bug #14314 (Resolved): Missing severity and Occurrence in DFMEA not coming under findings
- 12:51 PM Bug #14314 (Open): Missing severity and Occurrence in DFMEA not coming under findings
- 10:00 AM Bug #14314 (Resolved): Missing severity and Occurrence in DFMEA not coming under findings
- There is a rule set in DFMEA for"Missing severity" and "Missing Occurrence". After blanking out values for severity/O...
- 07:59 PM Bug #14334 (Resolved): DFMEA: when prepared by field has multiple members, it showing red and there is no finding for that
- 02:46 PM Bug #14334 (In Progress): DFMEA: when prepared by field has multiple members, it showing red and there is no finding for that
- Fixed
- 02:40 PM Bug #14334 (Open): DFMEA: when prepared by field has multiple members, it showing red and there is no finding for that
- 02:27 PM Bug #14334 (Resolved): DFMEA: when prepared by field has multiple members, it showing red and there is no finding for that
- DFMEA: when prepared by field has multiple members, it showing red and there is no finding for that
- 07:59 PM Bug #14199 (Resolved): Part number is validating only when it is blank for PFD document
- 11:46 AM Bug #14199 (In Progress): Part number is validating only when it is blank for PFD document
- Fixed
- 07:59 PM Bug #14263 (Resolved): DFMEA document page is not showing up after entering text under target date field.(Rev date missing finding is not displayed)
- 02:17 PM Bug #14263 (In Progress): DFMEA document page is not showing up after entering text under target date field.(Rev date missing finding is not displayed)
- 12:51 PM Bug #14263 (Open): DFMEA document page is not showing up after entering text under target date field.(Rev date missing finding is not displayed)
- 07:58 PM Bug #14330 (Resolved): DFMEA: Revision date field: System not showing any finding based on the rule "DFMEA4: Revision date must be present & Revision date Updated within last 3 months of the PSW"Its not showing finding based on PSW
- Fixed
- 02:40 PM Bug #14330 (In Progress): DFMEA: Revision date field: System not showing any finding based on the rule "DFMEA4: Revision date must be present & Revision date Updated within last 3 months of the PSW"Its not showing finding based on PSW
- 02:40 PM Bug #14330 (Open): DFMEA: Revision date field: System not showing any finding based on the rule "DFMEA4: Revision date must be present & Revision date Updated within last 3 months of the PSW"Its not showing finding based on PSW
- 01:18 PM Bug #14330 (Resolved): DFMEA: Revision date field: System not showing any finding based on the rule "DFMEA4: Revision date must be present & Revision date Updated within last 3 months of the PSW"Its not showing finding based on PSW
- DFMEA: Revision date field: System not showing any finding based on the rule "DFMEA4: Revision date must be present &...
- 07:58 PM Unit Level and Cosmetic Issues #14338 (Open): Parts Listing screen:When the supplier name is having more characters, then the parts are not aligned
- 02:45 PM Unit Level and Cosmetic Issues #14338 (Open): Parts Listing screen:When the supplier name is having more characters, then the parts are not aligned
- Parts Listing screen:When the supplier name is having more characters, then the parts are not aligned
- 02:10 PM Suggestion #14332 (Open): While answering questions, for each questions,when the user answered, the page gets loading.Better to load the screen after answering all the qns or better to answer and clicked on validate can change the key-findings results
- While answering questions, for each questions,when the user answered, the page gets loading.Better to load the screen...
- 01:15 PM Bug #14114 (Closed): Document verification: Rule:Rev number matches with PSW. Its not showing this finding
- Rev number should match with the revision number entered by the user not based on PSW
- 01:11 PM Bug #14114 (Not Resolved): Document verification: Rule:Rev number matches with PSW. Its not showing this finding
- 12:51 PM Bug #14254 (Open): DFMEA-"The Occ is 1 or 10 (7, M)" finding is showing up even after updating the value to 1 or 10.
Also available in: Atom